Roger E skrev:>>> Svend-Erik Kjær Madsen wrote:>> lør, 14 06 2008 kl. 13:48 +1000, skrev Roger E:>>>> >>> You're bound to get some comments on a post like that!>>> I agree that studio64 is probably the best. I don't use Suse on the >>> getting in bed with the devil principle. But I also prefer Kde or >>> Xfce to Gnome.>>> The latest Musix is very impressive, though maybe not really cutting >>> edge. dyne:bolic is very cool.>>> However I make most music on my everyday Debian/kde testing, which >>> is updated regularly. No RT kernel like Studio64 or Musix etc., but >>> Jack still runs nice with about 6ms latency on the vanilla kernel. >>> And no rebooting after browsing, mailing or killing evil zombies in >>> a 3d game. :)>>>>>> Roger>>> >>>> Hi Roger>>>> Could you share the secret behind getting a plain debian running>> "stable" round 6ms without any other apps affecting the invironment ?>> I guess if you have found the right settings it does not matter which>> desktop to choose ?>>>> /Sv-e>>>>>> >>> _______________________________________________>>> Linux-audio-user mailing list>>> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user>>> >>>>>> > I've attached a png snapshot of my Jack settings. Just about to leave > for work or I'd send text. (or which text file has these?)> I think my secret is using an M-Audio Audophile 2496.> And the kernels in an updated testing (Lenny atm) seem to get more > audio-friendly over time so stable (Etch atm) may be a little harder. > Then again Musix is based on Etch and works great.>> Cheers,Roger>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------> Ok, I've got an RME Multiface, but if I use a samplerate of 96000 my ADAT is no good. /Sv-e_______________________________________________Linux-audio-user mailing listLinux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
