On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Arnold Krille <arnold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008 schrieb Ken Restivo: >> Good call on Ardour; I probably would have had the easiest time working >> with this file in Ardour. Ardour is sweet. But for just editing one long >> audio file, it seemed a bit like overkill. Also, I'd be too tempted to >> overdub onto it, which is a no-no for a live recording :-) > > There are actually very good reasons to use ardour for post-processing of > live-recordings: > - Its completely non-destructive, even if you slice your 2-hour-file into > 10-seconds snippets and rearrange them and delete them one-by-one, you still > don't loose the material. Yes, you should have backups, but who knows... > - Its _very_ easy to apply mastering effects over the whole session. (And > with the jamin-control-plugin you can change settings between songs.) > - And all editing on effects and automation is non-destructive too. That is > very nice compared to clicking "apply effect (silence)", having the computer > work for ten minutes and the realize that a) its the wrong effect and b) > the "create undo" wasn't selected. > - ardour is definitely not trying to load the whole 2-hour file into ram... Don't forget the CD markers -> TOC export for creating CDs easily with Ardour. Works great for live CDs where you want to add track boundaries with no gaps for disk-at-once burning. jlc _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
