Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008 schrieb Ken Restivo: > Good call on Ardour; I probably would have had the easiest time working > with this file in Ardour. Ardour is sweet. But for just editing one long > audio file, it seemed a bit like overkill. Also, I'd be too tempted to > overdub onto it, which is a no-no for a live recording :-) There are actually very good reasons to use ardour for post-processing of live-recordings: - Its completely non-destructive, even if you slice your 2-hour-file into 10-seconds snippets and rearrange them and delete them one-by-one, you still don't loose the material. Yes, you should have backups, but who knows... - Its _very_ easy to apply mastering effects over the whole session. (And with the jamin-control-plugin you can change settings between songs.) - And all editing on effects and automation is non-destructive too. That is very nice compared to clicking "apply effect (silence)", having the computer work for ten minutes and the realize that a) its the wrong effect and b) the "create undo" wasn't selected. - ardour is definitely not trying to load the whole 2-hour file into ram... Arnold -- visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/ --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your administrator to do so...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
