Dave Phillips wrote: > I truly > believe that more problems come from new (and not so new) users naively > believing that *any* Linux distro is good enough for pro-quality audio > performance, if they just toss in the right kernel, and set those > priorities, and find the necessary drivers and firmware, and tweak those > JACK and ALSA settings... Ok, I run Ubuntu (recently switched from debian) and although ubuntu is performing well and debian very well, I'm interrested in trying out a dedicated pro-audio distro. I tried agnula once and was very disappointed, but maybe things improved... Looking at the list, trying to remember which name I heard the most times, and trying to stick with something debian-based I guess I should try out 64 studio, right? Could you fill in these datails that I wasn't able to (quickly) loacate on the web site: 1) What's the relation with debian? Is it based on testing or stable? Or is it totally self contained? 2) What's the release rate? 3) Am I gonna break the whole thing when using it as a "regular" linux, with everything that includes (wlan, 3d-accel/compiz, bluetooth, suspend/hibernate, cups, dual monitors, all those non-pro-audio things that tend to work well in ubuntu and seems to conflict with rock-steady audio performance). -- peace, love & harmony Atte http://atte.dk | http://myspace.com/attejensen http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
