Re: question re: Minicomputer synth

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Even tho the approach is not 'out there' (as it seems quite a bit of 
linux programs use this client / server approach) I have the feeling 
it's the kind of details that could pull off users from adopting linux 
as a music platform. If you plan on trying a synth, you'd want to see 
it's face right ? It's kind of the same as the jackd/jackstart/qjackctl 
issue. When I tryed it first, I got really confused by all of them. 
Actually, I still didn't get the jackstart/jackd difference, my eee 
seems to need jackstart, my ubuntu install doesn't even  have one.
 
In my views, a single executable would be a lot better, and if anybody 
wants to run it without a GUI, give them a command-line option. Sure 
that will mean your main executable will depend on user interface libs 
but i don't see anybody wanting to run the synth without wanting to 
tweak it at some point so the libs will be needed anyway....

my 2 cents :)
Marc.

Malte Steiner a écrit :
> Feedback from the community and advices would be 
> highly appreciated because I have more ideas in mind for strange sounds. 
>   

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux