Kaffeine works for me. I hate Noatun. I find mplayer nice for command line use. I don't care much about media player's organization abilities, I'm find with Konqueror's file management capabilities. Loki Davison wrote: > Hi all, > Well, name says it all, what do people like for an audio player? > I read this blog post and was wondering if there is something he > missed as i have somewhat similar experiences, > > http://blog.brokenfunction.com/2008/04/26/why-arent-there-any-good-linux-media-players/ > > I've been using audacious and amarok and both seem to have there > problems. Amarok makes me think too much about searching and freaks > out parsing a lot of my collection and seem really, really stupid in a > few ways. Also i don't like it how it can't just play from the > collection, i.e when it finishes that album, just go onto the next, > etc. Audacious is ok in a no organisation at all way. I like all my > music to be easy to search and there is 200gb of it. > > Aqualung seems technically just what i want, but the interface is not > my taste. I find it really ugly and a bit unfriendly. > > So what are the options? -- David gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx authenticity, honesty, community _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
