Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > Lee Revell wrote: >> On Dec 15, 2007 12:42 AM, Robert Persson <ireneshusband@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On my system, as well as the problem of clients being disconnected, jack >>> itself crashes a lot. I did not notice this problem until I started >>> using the SVN version. Jackd definitely gets realtime priority, albeit >>> using realtime-lsm (I didn't get very far with PAM). From what you have >>> said, this means that I must have a problem with configuration for the >>> hardware. I have an Audigy 2. Are there any weird settings I need to use >>> for this card to get jack running smoothly? >> That's exactly what I would expect from an arbitrary SVN checkout. Of >> course, it would be a great help to the developers if you could get >> core dumps from these crashes (do "ulimit -c unlimited" then launch >> JACK from a terminal). >> > > afaict, if Robert is using jack svn, most probably jackd is hanging and > gets killed by its own jack_watchdog. having a core dump might not help > much in that situation i'm afraid. > > the problem still resides in jackd (bad) behavior to get stuck when it > tries to kick-out some client due to a probable timeout or even non-zero > process callback return value. haven't i told you before that it > suffices for a client process() callback to return a non-zero value to > let jackd crash itself? and there's a lot of jacks apps out there which > are still returning non-zero as a legal value, for self-shutdown for > instance. just let one of those get in or out from the jack graph and > kiss goodbye to your rock solid and stable jackd, bwaahahah :o) > > this is happenning on jack svn for quite some time now (>= 0.105.x), > almost since early Spring'07 :) As per Dave's advice I've changed the topic. I posted a fix for this issue to the jack devel mailing list, and I'm waiting for feedback. It solves these issues for me, so I guess you could say that it's going to be fixed RSN. After positive feedback it will be committed. Greets, Pieter PS: apparently persistent subtle complaining on high-exposure lists does pay of on the long run :). Thx to Rui for constantly raising the priority of this issue. ;) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user