Re: realtime kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have a laptop with athlon 64 1.8Ghz and couldn't feel any ferformance 
difference between timer 1000 Hz vs. lower res. If you keep the lower 
resolution of the default 250 Hz Rosegarden will complain, so if you 
decide to use Rg it's no question...
Greets
Su

Julien Claassen schrieb:
> Hi everyone!
>   Short question only: If I compile a realtime kernel, with Ingo's patches, do 
> I need to set the timer to 1000Hz. Or is it best to do so. My system is about 
> 2 and a half years old athlon 2500+ CPU 1.8gHz.
>   Kindest regards
>         Julien
>
> --------
> Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
>
> ======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
> http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
> the Linux TextBased Studio guide
> ======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
> http://www.juliencoder.de
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
>   
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux