Re: difference between realtime-kernel and low-latency-kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 14 October 2007, porl sheean wrote:
> i have actually had no end of trouble with ubuntustudio's (and now
> ubuntu's) rt kernel. on an amd 6000+ system with 1gig ram and a rme9652
> soundcard i can't get reliable performance under 40 or so ms. i even tried
> a vanilla kernel with the rt patches and had the same trouble. the 64studio
> kernel worked fine, however. i'm currently running at 5ms with it and have
> had no problems. this is even with compiz fusion running and spinning the
> cube whilst playing back audio from an 18 channel ardour project. what
> patches would cause such a difference in performance? it isn't any options
> selected in 'make menuconfig' - i loaded the 64studio's ones in and used
> them. still no luck. i can only assume they have added more patches to do
> with realtime performance than just the -rt patchset. any ideas?

Hi,

let us see the output of this script on your ubuntu RT box with jackd running:

http://tapas.affenbande.org/rt-setup-report.sh

Thanks,
Flo

-- 
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux