Re: difference between realtime-kernel and low-latency-kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Afaik it was more or less experimental and you had to add it yourself
but it worked really well.
There is a realtime kernel by default in gutsy.


On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:33:07 +0200
Matthias Schönborn <mbs1303@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Hey list,
> 
> I've just read that there's a difference between a realtime-kernel
> and the low-latency-kernel provided by ubuntustudio. The text in the
> german wiki on ubuntuusers.de said, that a realtime-kernel is
> slightly better than the lowlatencykernel
> (http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/Echtzeitkernel) - then why isn't it used
> in ubuntustudio? Or do I just mix something up?
> 
> Regards
> Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux