On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 10:23 -0700, Ken Restivo wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:04:28AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > i have absolutely nothing personal against the debian JACK packager, but > > words cannot begin to express the appalling state of affairs that the > > misguided addition of -VERSION to the JACK library name has caused for > > Debian users of JACK, along with most Ubuntu and other > > derived-distributions. i would say we see at least 1-2 people per week > > on the #ardour IRC channel who face the problem caused by this decision. > > Even though it has been fixed now, its effects will linger on for at > > least another year, perhaps even more. its a very frustrating thing for > > me as a JACK developer to see different people bumping into this over > > and over again, a situation that makes it appear that JACK has design > > problems when all it really suffers from is a package design error. > > > > I am very glad it has been fixed! > > Would recommending that people upgrade to sid solve this problem? No need, it's in Testing already. --ll
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
