Am 2007-08-14 05:55:25, schrieb Chris McCormick:
> My vote is for people to 'reply to all' when they want to reply to
> all/list, and 'reply' when they want to reply just to the sender (keep
> it how it is right now, as is supported in all mail clients).
The problem is, that most peoples are to sick or lazzy to remove the
Private-Address when using Reply-To-All. I receive per day 10-20
Carbon Copies and sometime I was wondering WHY the message does NOT
APPEAR in the lists... Argh!!!
I am subscribed with TWO E-Mails on this list, One which suck the
messages and is 100% SPAM-FREE and then the second, which I use to
post here, which receive per day between 500 and 38.000 SPAMs.
I have configured my procmail/MUA, that if I am IN the LAU/LAD folder
I use the List-Reply but if I am in my "linux4michelle" folder I use
"Reply" which mean, if someone use "Reply-To-All" and do not remove
my E-Mail I get it twice and since I check "linux4michelle" before
"LAU/LAD" I will end up in PM's.
I am voting for a "Driver-License" for the Internet-Use.
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
