Re: Fwd: Hardware Choices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




(CC-ed to jack-audio-dev list)


"Thomas Vecchione":

                  Seablade

On 7/20/07, Kjetil S. Matheussen <k.s.matheussen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Thomas Vecchione" <seablaede@xxxxxxxxx>

I heard Jack (jackdmp?) could only take advantage of two cores right
now?

No.

Mind being a bit more specific?  As in no it will handle 4,8, or 16 cores
well?


Sorry, that was a short rude answer, especially since I'm not 100% sure of the answer either. But I would be surprised if jackdmp was limited to two, or any other high-value fixed number of, parallel sound processing threads.

And on the other hand, if you are wrong, which I think you are, although I'm not 100% sure about that, you could be responsible for continuing to spread a(nother) misunderstanding about jackdmp. (The previous one was that jackdmp could not work on single processor machines)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux