Hi!
Well Ken, why so many now pick on ardour. I think it might be both
bewildering and completely understandable. I'm more affiliated with the
understanding end. And that DOES NOT mean, that I dislike ardour, how can I, I
can't use it at all? But the more users you have and the more famous the
project gets, the more people to get in such a discussion. Also the more will
be there to drop a lot of good words about it, if they think it's necessary at
all, because they're so sure, that it's good.
I also agree with Kjetil: It's ok that people complain, but well the rest of
the discussion I followed seemed a bit childish! With a lot of unfounded
fights and accusations! Isn't this all about software? It is! And software is
something rather rational if you get down to the core? I think so. There's
code at the very base, which is either working fne or it isn't, but it is
_rather- simple to pinpoint this. And above the code level there is design?
About that you can argue, but I think even that has specifications or definite
ideas, about which one can argue instead of being just unspecific.
Kindest regards
Julien
P.S.: Sorry for intruding, me no ardour-user, but I found it all too stupid,
unnecessarily angry and unproductive!
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
