Re: [LAU] Looking for AD converter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Mike Taht" <mike.taht@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> There are only three real features of 96khz recording that I notice:

The only theoretical benefit of 96kHz over 48kHz is that the input
filters on the AD does not need to be so sharp that it affects
frequencies below 24kHz. At least to my knowledge. 

I've still to find the reason for 192kHz.

> Mixing it is much easier, much more headroom

Wouldn't this translate to bit depth?. 

-- 
Esben Stien is b0ef@e     s      a             
         http://www. s     t    n m
          irc://irc.  b  -  i  .   e/%23contact
           sip:b0ef@   e     e 
           jid:b0ef@    n     n
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux