On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 08:04:43AM -0700, Mike Taht wrote: > I have spent the last year recording extensively at 96khz. There are only > three real features of 96khz recording that I notice: > > 1) Stereo imaging seems slightly better > 2) Mixing it is much easier, much more headroom, I haven't used a compressor > in ages > 3) Recording low volume (environmental) sounds sounds much better. This looks more like your 44.1 or 48kHz HW having problems than any inherent advantage of 96 kHz. -- FA Follie! Follie! Delirio vano è questo ! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
