On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 01:03 -0700, Ken Restivo wrote: > My question is: should I use MIDI or OSC as the control interface? OSC seems > a lot more flexible, and more modern, and I've already found a few things that > would be much cleaner in OSC. But I'm worried about latency in going from MIDI > to OSC, or any other gotchas that might be awaiting. Then again, this is 2007, > and byte-oriented protocols are so 1980's, and maybe I'm over-worrying this. > > But, surveying the Linux softsynth landscape, I see OM/Ingen and LinuxSampler > and maybe a few others using OSC as their control interface, and everything > else using MIDI. And I have to wonder if there's a reason for that other than > just history. Ingen uses MIDI _and_ OSC. I don't know of any sequencers or hardware interfaces that send OSC for note control, so if you want people to be able to play the synth without too much trouble you probably want to support MIDI. Also, are there any realtime safe, sample synchronous IPC routing systems for OSC? --ll
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
