On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 11:27 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Bengt Gördén hat gesagt: // Bengt Gördén wrote: > > > fredag 30 mars 2007 00:38 skrev Robin Gareus: > > > X-BeenThere: linux-audio-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > X-BeenThere: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > X-BeenThere: linux-audio-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Sure. It will probably take care of the problem but the X-headers are not > > standard (although they are used quite frequently). The List-ID is. > > > > I'm not sure how it would look but something like this I expect. Mind you. Not > > an @ but rather a dot(.) in between. > > > > List-id: lad.lists.linuxaudio.org > > List-id: lau.lists.linuxaudio.org > > List-id: laa.lists.linuxaudio.org > > I would love if the current List-id's could be kept, except the > list-addresses. Same here. List-Id headers allow you to "Reply to list" in clients that support it - no need to "Reply to all", creating confusing extra To: addresses, or type in the address manually and lose the In-Reply-To headers, thus ruining the thread structure. --ll
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
