Patrick Shirkey wrote: > On 11:22:25 pm 03/08/07 Robin Gareus <robin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> I'm following the look'n'logo evolution with interest. looks a >>>> lot like software devel. 1st version nice and clean, and we get >>>> fixes as well as new bugs with each revision :) >>> I kept a few revisions to myself ;) >>> For a more professional approach, one would start with a briefing >>> and generate many variations. I try to cut down on that, though. >> oh dear, my remark was intended as compliment! - glad we skipped the >> briefing.. - we at linuxaudio.org are no professionals ;) >> > > Depends if you take from the German meaning or the English. As much as some > might not want to admit it, at least a few of us are :-P > aah crap. - pro-fessione vs. amator again, ey? - diversity is a pro! and right, linuxaudio.org is professional in many aspects, too ! ..some are in for the groupies others for the money. :) not that there is/are much(many?) of either at linuxaudio.org - well and I can only speak for myself, of course. I was under the impression that linuxaudio.org is a NPO, implying a mission not a profession. For instance: Would linuxaudio.org pay a designer if it had the means to do so? - or is it just a matter of the license the design will be released under? - or does it need sound right? - the ironic conclusion: linuxaudio.org even lacks funding for ideological discussions. - things here are shaped from what falls from the sky and the briefings are dubbed jam-sessions ;) back from the off-topic. What I actually meant to say in the first place is that: IMHO Thorsten's "release early, release often" approach and mailing-list discussion is quite preferable to a corporate identity briefing [for linuxaudio.org]. and he's been courteous and patient which are feat. that professional designers often lack! The apps site as is does not *look* professional (meaning of marketing), it's actually rather amateurish ([be]loved, cared about, blessed). #robin
