Re: AMS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:55:23PM +0100, Malte Steiner wrote:
> I downloaded and read the code of AMS and see some possibilities to 
> improve its CPU load, it doesnt looked very optimized. Next week I could 
> do the coding and send the patches to Fons, whom I already contacted.
> 
> My approach I would descripe evolutionary, not revolutionary. Its like 
> opening a big expensive vintage Moog Modular for soldering. I dont want 
> to rewrite the soundengine, but like to help with optimizations and 
> improvements regarding usebility. The changes have to be done very 
> carefully and I will do an A/B test with the old AMS on the left and the 
> new AMS on the right ear.
> Thats all I can offer...
> 

That would be great! I'm trying to move away from GUI's and to ChucK and maybe SuperCollider or CSound for the future, but AMS gets some great sounds and I'll continue to use it.

Is Fons or someone setting up a GNA/Savannah/something public repository so people can submit patches and/or track SVN on it as it rises from its sleep?

- -ken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF6Gr5e8HF+6xeOIcRArVwAJ9wn24itiXVnnJYmKfZSwzEYYUG6wCgySrv
ZMhxNZOiSm2a+CDL8U8bMa8=
=xQfo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux