-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Gaydenko schrieb: > > ======= On Friday 23 February 2007, Hartmut Noack wrote: ======= >> Since the first time, I compared the output of ams at 16/44.1 to the >> output of the very same patch at 24/96 I know, what hi-res is good for ;-) >> >> > > > Which DAC have you used? Terratec EWX 24/96 / envy24 > The thing is, real resolution of almost all > DACs is not better rather 14-15 bits. Very rare and very expensive DACs > have real resolution about 20-21 bits. > May it be :-) the switch from 16/44.1 to 24/96 is very well audible anyway :-). I guess, for the realworld-usage of this card signal/noise ratio is of greater importance then the question, if the DAC could compute even greater resolution then the one I hear. So having the very same DAC in a breakoutbox shielded from Fanmotors and Powersupplies could increase the quality of the recordings... best regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF3qjc1Aecwva1SWMRAubIAJ903kgKzZu3gJAT1m10jyuRE+O3mwCdG/RF 1BC0o5UPFD0jt4c19UERBGc= =XEmn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
