Re: Linux music editor, greater than 32-bit ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



david wrote:

Folderol wrote:

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:48:04 -0600
millward <millward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I've got a sound card capable of 96 bits, ( M-Audio audiofile 24/96 )
but my sound editor, Audacity for Linux, only goes up to 32 bits.
Is there a sound editor for Linux that can do higher than 32 bits?


Maybe I'm missing something here, but what on earth does anyone need
such high resolution for?

ISTR The humble CD is recorded at 18bit. which is over 200,000:1 and
more than 100dB. The orchestral dynamic range is I believe quoted at
90dB. I accept some extra headroom is nice, and the calculations aren't
quite so simple, but even 32bit comes out at mind boggling 200dB.


I don't know about such things in the audio world, but in the world of color photography, most professional digital equipment uses 48-bit color

Yes, but this 48bit representation of color is just 16bit x3 colors [channels]. In other words the 48bit representation is 3 unrelated 16bit [channel] representations concatenated, one each for the 3 primary colors/CCD sensors. The equivilent for audio would be just 16bit as there is only one channel.

This is way outside the reproduction range of any photo printing/display technology. But even though a particular 48-bit color might not be printable or displayable, it is still there. It can be taken into consideration when doing color adjustments and image filters. The end result is that when color depth is reduced to the 24-bit color range that JPG uses - you get better and more accurate color reductions.

Following from above, your final JPG color depth gets reduced to just 8bits per color which is why RGB uses values from 0-255. 8bits only has informaiton for 256 values.

So I would think that working in higher bit-depths for audio would similarly result in better sounding audio when it's reduced to CD format.

This is true, but as Folderol wrote, 32 bits should be *plenty* of dynamic range for audio. In fact, it has been argued that ~22bits is sufficient as beyond this you get into the h/w noise floor, hearing limits, etc.

(Any other experts out there, feel free to jump in if I'm wrong here...)

HTH,
Rick



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux