Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:58:26 +0100 > Leonard Ritter <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:41 +0100, Thomas Kuther wrote: > > > I understand that Aldrin w/o lunar, ladspa, dssi or anything is > > > pretty pointless, right? > > > > actually, ladspa and dssi were not meant to be supported. i did the > > wrappers only for fun, in fact i think it's a terrible idea to have > > them at all. > > > > lunar is important, and llvm is a heavy dependency, i agree. > > perhaps i can swap llvm for gcc, which everybody should have... > > > > if you are interested in the reason why llvm is included at all, i > > can perhaps explain a little. > > > > Yes, I (and maybe others) would be interested. I never heard of it > before and am just starting to see what it is good for. > > Currently all i know about it is that it tends to cause massive > headaches for packagers and others trying to compile it :) > There isn't any llvm package on SuSE so I have to package llvm to? It is a little bit overkill for another sequenzer. For the moment i keep aldrin-0.8 and libzzub-0.1.
