On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:41 +0100, Thomas Kuther wrote: > I understand that Aldrin w/o lunar, ladspa, dssi or anything is > pretty pointless, right? actually, ladspa and dssi were not meant to be supported. i did the wrappers only for fun, in fact i think it's a terrible idea to have them at all. lunar is important, and llvm is a heavy dependency, i agree. perhaps i can swap llvm for gcc, which everybody should have... if you are interested in the reason why llvm is included at all, i can perhaps explain a little. -- Leonard Ritter -- Freelance Art & Logic -- http://www.leonard-ritter.com
