-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 The first thing I've learned at my lecture on Cryptography was that any kind of cryptographic system should not rely on secret code. If there are really secret parts in iLok then I see no choice in porting it to Linux without official support from the keeper of this ominous secret code. Maybe I should buy a Receptor and reverse engineer it? ;-) Markus Michael Ost schrieb: >> On 1/9/07, "Josh Lawrence" <hardbop200@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think your best bet would be to contact Muse Research and ask them, >> since they have gone to the trouble to figure it out. The chances of >> them letting that information go is slim, but hey, you don't know >> until you try. > > We implemented iLok support in Receptor through a special arrangement > with Pace, the makers of the iLok. We wrote a winelib DLL that accesses > Pace's "secret sauce" code that Pace built against our 2.4.19 based > kernel and usb libraries. > > So, at present, there is no general use support for it. But I am > sympathetic to your goals and will ask Pace whether they are interested > in general Linux support ... as time permits. But, frankly, we are a > small shop and time doesn't permit much these days. > > You might do well to ask Pace yourself. They are at www.paceap.com. > > - Michael Ost > Muse Research, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpqb3uXdsp50C0vMRCAJlAJ4/n5CsE9iHv+if0kEtYOuS65c8yACgxv35 WHOobkNMsUBivRJz0gpbPug= =eij1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
