On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 14:59 +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > The place of AMS has largely been taken by Om, and a integration of > the best of AMS into Om would IMHO be a interesting development. > Unfortunately Om does not really support the logarithmic 'control > voltage' concept that is at the heart of AMS and of the analog synths > it was designed to emulate. The reason being AFAICS that Om's author > seems to dislike it and prefers linear controls - we had some heated > exchanges about this. Mixing both paradigms into a single program > *could* indeed confuse some users, but that is a IMHO a matter of > documentation and education. Is there really any need for explicit support for logarithmic control in the engine itself? All ugens in Om/Ingen except for a very small number that interface with the audio and MIDI ins and outs are LADSPA (or similar) plugins, it's not as if you can't connect a logarithmic output port of one plugin to a logarithmic input port of another. -- Lars Luthman - please encrypt any email sent to me if possible PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x04C77E2E Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
