-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: >> No, the idea is very good. However, it should be of the same >> quality as Dave's page. And therefore, we need all the categories >> he has. (list below). Because I think the first thing to do would be to >> copy all the contents from Dave's page into wikipedia. >> I'm not sure if we can easily "copy" all of the content into wikipedia.. and IMHO that's exactly the point: wikipedia will learn about [linux] audio software by other means and present it as an encyclopedia entry. (eg. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ardour_%28audio_processor%29 ) I don't think wikipedia will provide a flexible interface for indexing and browsing sound applications.. but I'll support any endeavors. >> And the question then is, will wikipedia allow us to create all >> these sub-categories? (linux-audio-Demos, linux-audio-digital-dj, and so >> on.) > > I'd say that wikipedia should be used as a summary page, rather than an > exhaustive resource with app-specific documentation. So, I guess in that > respect I do agree with your ideas. However, I do not see it as an > exhaustive documentation resource for every app. i could not have said it better! cheers Ivica. > For the aforesaid reasons, I feel that a wikipedia page in conjunction to > project's homepages is IMHO not enough. That is not to say that we shouldn't > have one, but I simply see it as a summary resource which leads user towards > the real documentation site. I'd like to see the current (3?) wiki approaches to be improved and merged into http://lau.linuxaudio.org or wiki.linuxaudio.org.. and going to continue the discussion in the wiki thread.. #robin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFgtGneVUk8U+VK0IRAiunAJ99XUaDLH2AnKd/RlGM1wndVK9ySACgm3E5 aFtmp8L6N7Mj6EBH2jgBh/g= =xtxM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
