> > I'd say that wikipedia should be used as a summary page, rather than an > > exhaustive resource with app-specific documentation. So, I guess in that > > respect I do agree with your ideas. However, I do not see it as an > > exhaustive documentation resource for every app. > > I think that is what the Wikipedia policies also have in mind. I > thought that the point, from the subject, was attracting more > developers (and non-Linux users, especially). For that purpose, > Wikipedia is probably a much better starting point than a more > Linux-centric site. > > As for the specific documentation, my suggestion is to limit the > number of wikis. One is really better than three. It means less > maintenance work for the maintainers (and thanks to those who decide > to do it). It will be much easier for a community of this limited size > to clean up the vandalism of spammers or correct mistakes than > dividing our efforts among three locations. Maybe most importantly, if > I have a question, I don't have to go to three different places to > look for the information. Similarly, if I have documentation to > contribute, I don't have to go three places to add it. So, in a nutshell, we agree? Ico
