Marc-Olivier Barre wrote: >> > open for editing to all registered users >> >> How is the one we already have, not perfect? > It's nice, but it will need to evolve, since software also evolves. I don't know if it is just me, but isn't a wiki the worst case scenario for this site? It is a link collection, and most, if not all, of the software in the links already have websites of their own to some extent. A wiki, and this one seems to be no exception, lacks a clear navigational structure, or at least overview. The basic questions that need to be answered are: 1. Where am I? 2. Where can I go? 3. How can I get back? and in a wiki those questions are harder to answer than in a regular menudriven website. And first and foremost, most wikis are fairly ugly. ;) The aspect of community driven content however, is something that I stand behind, but some smaller projects that I have been involved in have not benefited from it. I'm of the opinion that some sort of form to fill in would suffice for the information necessary, and then a number of volunteers to format that information. And so there is no question about my bias: Yes, I have already sketched on such a website and made a first layout using the original content from linux-sound.org. But that is not the point I'm trying to make, I'm glad to have done this in vain if only the final result is better. :) Some good information may be found at http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting/ if you are interested about writing for the web. Highest regard, Mathias
