Re: Re: Interview with EnergyXT Developer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Paul Davis:

On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 08:44 +0100, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Fons Adriaensen:

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 05:27:54PM -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:

I think one good thing that is coming out of this is that the creator has
apparently convinced some VST makers to recompile their VSTs for Linux as
well. So, not all that is commercial is necessarily evil...

What does that mean, a VST compiled for Linux ? Will it work without
a Windoze emulator ?


Sure, many vst plugins either don't have a gui, or are based on toolsets
that are available for linux as well, such as juce, vstgui and fltk.
(I've been reading the vst development list for some years)

vstgui is not really available for linux at this time. theoretically
there is a motif backend, but it seems that hardly anyone uses it or
even attempts to make sure that it works with the latest changes to
vstgui.


Yeah, you are right. Didn't think enough before posting.


i think that the number of vst plugins using JUCE or FLTK can be counted
on the fingers of one person's hands.


Maybe, but you also have qt, fox, wxwindows and others that might be used.

Anyhow, at least theres a bunch of gui-less vst plugins, so you need many hands to count all of the plugins that doesn't require more than a new makefile and a few #ifdefs here and there to recompile for linux.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux