Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From: Frank Barknecht <fbar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:49:27 +0200
In-reply-to: <20061026064025.GL17907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20061025123237.EC3BB3A6B42C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1161807211.2309.109.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061025203656.GH17907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200610251938.29356.lau@xxxxxxxxx> <20061026064025.GL17907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
> I'm trying to use it like that at all. 

Oops, there's an important "not" missing in this sentence. :(

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__

References:
- Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Paul Davis
- Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Frank Barknecht
- Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Rob
- Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Frank Barknecht

Prev by Date: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by Date: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Previous by thread: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by thread: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux