On Wednesday 20 September 2006 21:31, Nick Copeland was like: > On a related issue, what are other wishes for bristol? My plans are the > midi support, lash support, a korg ms-20 type synth, finalise the mixer and > perhaps add a bristol modular although I don't like this last idea to much > as it goes against the idea of being an emulator. > > I will put the EMS Synthi on the list, although I don't have a breadboard > patching and I was not aware they had patch cable controlled synths - this > is EMS, no? I will admit to wanting to work on some of their synths > already, but if I get a breadboard then perhaps an ARP 2500 is on the cards > although that is a lot more work. I confess to not having looked at Bristol for a long time. Last time I looked it didn't work at all on my system and I wasn't savvy enough to send in any kind of bug report. I *need* a decent analog synth emulator. If you really have plans to incorporate MS-20 and EMS Synthi type synths, I will gladly help test them out. I don't understand what you mean by breadboard - this is some sort of patching system? If you can even figure out how to digitally simulate EMS filters, it would constitute a Major victory in my books. Anyhow, it's clearly time to have a serious play around with Bristol. Good to know you're on the case. :) -- cheers, tim hall http://glastonburymusic.org.uk/tim We are the people We've been waiting for.
