On 9/12/06, Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thorsten Wilms wrote: > Ooh, you documented your problems in all detail, posted about > them and/or filed bug reports? Something like that, yeah (except the bug report part, reason explained below)... I forgot to mention that it wasn't really a problem with lash itself, but the quickly-done lash-implementation in some of the programs I used (and want to use), most notably specimen and zynaddsubfx. Reason for no bug report: Both programs are not very actively maintained, and lash support from the users point of view is a matter of finding the right patch and applying it to the source. This means that there's not really *one* person to talk to, since the people maintaining the software didn't implement the lash support and the authors of patches doesn't maintain the software. -- peace, love & harmony Atte
I think Dave wrote the current lash code in specimen, so he might be interested in reports. Loki
