On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:57:20PM +0200, Atte André Jensen wrote: > I forgot to mention that it wasn't really a problem with lash itself, > but the quickly-done lash-implementation in some of the programs I used > (and want to use), most notably specimen and zynaddsubfx. > > Reason for no bug report: > Both programs are not very actively maintained, and lash support from > the users point of view is a matter of finding the right patch and > applying it to the source. This means that there's not really *one* > person to talk to, since the people maintaining the software didn't > implement the lash support and the authors of patches doesn't maintain > the software. Last I heared of Zyn, a complete rewrite was planned, so any bug report is indead likely a waste of effort :) But Eric Rzewnicki took over on Specimen, and there has been some activity. He even asks for "any ideas you have concerning specimen's future." http://zhevny.com/specimen/ -- Thorsten Wilms
