On 8/24/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 21:50 +0200, Lars Luthman wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 12:45 -0700, Drucer Ninetynine wrote: > > http://www.linuxsampler.org/ > > > > Nope, not dead :) > > http://www.linuxsampler.org/downloads.html > > Not open source. > Yes, it is open source (the source is avaliable - QED). It's not GPL or free software. Lee
Yes, that's a reasonable clarification on my point. Thanks for keeping me honest. I continue to be curious if this was the product that caused them to change the license from GPL to non-GPL. I've never heard. Anyone wishing to can comment back privately if they would prefer. Cheers, Mark
