On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 15:53 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 21:50 +0200, Lars Luthman wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 12:45 -0700, Drucer Ninetynine wrote: > > > http://www.linuxsampler.org/ > > > > > > Nope, not dead :) > > > > http://www.linuxsampler.org/downloads.html > > > > Not open source. > > > > Yes, it is open source (the source is avaliable - QED). It's not GPL or > free software. I suppose it depends on which definition you use. I prefer this one: http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php So according to your definition it is, according to mine it isn't. No disagreement. -- Lars Luthman - please encrypt any email sent to me if possible PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x04C77E2E Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
