-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Shirkey schrieb: >> >> Maybe so but money is not the preliminary target. >> > > It is if you use a commercial copyright. > is CC share alike attribution non-commercial THAT commercial? >> There are hundreds of tracks made in the community allready, that do not >> incorporate a single second of any previously published record. DJing is >> not the only way to make music... >> > > I have yet to hear a truly original piece from this community. Even if > it is created with original recordings and samples. Everything I have > listened to takes influence from the work of others or attempts to > emulate a sound that has already been discovered (occasionally with > excellent technical execution). There IS a difference between playing in a style, that has been developed before by others and taking the recordings of others and use them as loops. Even citing someones licks/riffs/harmonies is not an issue - a recording comes straight from the person it has made it, to use it in large chunks is no new interpretation the same as a new recording is. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE4I7f1Aecwva1SWMRAvFiAJ4jkxOKP2TU48nrr2BOZJ3m8WayOQCbBJUi mSuA2bNkgh0jlK2D0geDkmQ= =Xr7Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
