--- Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > R Parker wrote: > > > > How do think the owners of GPL licensed software > will > > feel when this behaviour you subscribe to becomes > the > > norm for their source code? What distinguishes a > DJ > > from the person who violates those rights? > > > > GPL anything can be freely remixed. What's your > point? The GPL defines a set of rights. What happens when I violate those rights? You claim it's OK to violate the rights of the copyright owner for music. What is the difference? Why is it OK to violate a musicians rights but not OK to violate a software developers rights? Ron Parker Mirror Image Studio > >> the liklihood of that happening around here is > slim > >> to non existant. > >> > >> So, If you are going to complain every time a DJ > >> makes a remix > > > > Please don't use a personal attacks when debating > with > > me. > > > > HuH? > > > There is a system in place that enables you to use > > property that other people own the rights to. Be > > responsible and learn to use it. > > > > There's plenty I'd like to say but ironically > enough I > > have a session with a DJ for whom we wrote the > beats. > > It'll go about six or eight hours. Maybe I'll > check in > > later to see what's up. Maybe I won't. > > > > Up to you. > > > -- > Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd. > Http://www.boosthardware.com > Http://lau.linuxaudio.org - The Linux Audio Users > guide > ======================================== > > "Anything your mind can see you can manifest > physically, then it will > become reality" - Macka B > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
