Re: LAM ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LAM ??
From: Dave Phillips <dlphillips@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:19:15 -0400
In-reply-to: <20060618214553.GA3212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4493F133.5000500@xxxxxxxxxx> <20060618214553.GA3212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060209 Red Hat/1.7.12-0.90.2.legacy

Hans Fugal wrote:

Sorry, a daemon had died. It's up again.

On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 at 08:10 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
Received from lam.fugal.net :
Bad Gateway: The proxy server received an invalid response from anupstream server.
What's up ?

All is well now. :) Thanks !

Best,

dp

References:
- LAM ??
  - From: Dave Phillips
- Re: LAM ??
  - From: Hans Fugal

Prev by Date: Re: Remixing
Next by Date: loopback with hda-intel
Previous by thread: Re: LAM ??
Next by thread: Denormal Trouble
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux