Re: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
From: Wolfgang Woehl <tito@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 22:47:58 +0200
In-reply-to: <ec9314860605232232k36ec610cob38a2b7775a961d5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200605241028.02843.tito@xxxxxxxxxx> <1148427200.12529.190.camel@mindpipe> <ec9314860605232232k36ec610cob38a2b7775a961d5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.8

Wednesday 24 May 2006 07:32, Loki Davison:
> system. Should i have CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL on or off?

CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL (Big kernel lock) should be "yes" (on)

References:
- Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Wolfgang Woehl
- Re: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Lee Revell
- Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Loki Davison

Prev by Date: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
Next by Date: Re: [ANN] realtime-lsm 0.8.6 available via SourceForge
Previous by thread: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
Next by thread: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux