Rossen Apostolov wrote:
Thomas Kuther wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:41:24 -0500
"Reuben Martin" <reuben.m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4/17/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can you file a Gentoo bug report asking them to fully support
the RTPRIO rlimit?
<SNIP>
First step is for me to research the Gentoo bugzilla and see what
I can find. I'll get back to you with that.
Seems that there has been a report for 8 months with no action
taken:
Yeah, I'm the one who filed it. I don't know why they are dragging
their feet to use the newer versions. I suspect that it presents
incompatibilities with other programs somewhere that they are waiting
to be fixed.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101766
I guess the issue doesn't seem important enough to them yet, or this
description hasn't made it clear enough.
- Mark
There is an overlay that provides gentoo standard PAM + the patch for
RLIMITS usability (beside a lot of nice software not in portage ;)).
svn co svn://svn.tuxfamily.org/svnroot/ckpp/proaudio
Might take ages till they include it into main portage, unfortunately.
Gentoo provides realtime-lsm so far, i guess they think that's enough
and easier anyway.
HTH
tom
this overlay is great!
but see what i get:
$ eix -e lash
* media-libs/lash [3]
Available versions: 0.5.0 0.5.1
Installed: none
Homepage: http://www.nongnu.org/lash
Description: LASH Audio Session Handlern
* media-sound/lash
Available versions: 0.5.1
Installed: 0.5.1
Homepage: http://www.nongnu.org/lash/
Description: LASH Audio Session Handler
[1] /usr/overlays/mine
[2] /usr/overlays/chutz
[3] /usr/overlays/proaudio
why is lash put in media-libs when it's in media-sound in gentoo.org?
Rossen
This is because ladcca is in media-libs and lash is the successor so I
placed it in the same directory. Recently lash hit portage and the
maintainer put it into the "wrong category".
I'll ask him why he added it to media-sound.
Frieder
