Thomas Kuther wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:41:24 -0500 > "Reuben Martin" <reuben.m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 4/17/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Can you file a Gentoo bug report asking them to fully support >>>>> the RTPRIO rlimit? >>> <SNIP> >>>> First step is for me to research the Gentoo bugzilla and see what >>>> I can find. I'll get back to you with that. >>>> >>> Seems that there has been a report for 8 months with no action >>> taken: >> Yeah, I'm the one who filed it. I don't know why they are dragging >> their feet to use the newer versions. I suspect that it presents >> incompatibilities with other programs somewhere that they are waiting >> to be fixed. >> >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101766 >>> >>> I guess the issue doesn't seem important enough to them yet, or this >>> description hasn't made it clear enough. >>> >>> - Mark >>> > > There is an overlay that provides gentoo standard PAM + the patch for > RLIMITS usability (beside a lot of nice software not in portage ;)). > > svn co svn://svn.tuxfamily.org/svnroot/ckpp/proaudio > > Might take ages till they include it into main portage, unfortunately. > Gentoo provides realtime-lsm so far, i guess they think that's enough > and easier anyway. > > HTH > tom > this overlay is great! but see what i get: $ eix -e lash * media-libs/lash [3] Available versions: 0.5.0 0.5.1 Installed: none Homepage: http://www.nongnu.org/lash Description: LASH Audio Session Handlern * media-sound/lash Available versions: 0.5.1 Installed: 0.5.1 Homepage: http://www.nongnu.org/lash/ Description: LASH Audio Session Handler [1] /usr/overlays/mine [2] /usr/overlays/chutz [3] /usr/overlays/proaudio why is lash put in media-libs when it's in media-sound in gentoo.org? Rossen
