On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:12 -0500, Joe Hartley wrote: > On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:19:53 -0500 > Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > the reason their stuff is so good is not directly related to the > > > > converters themselves, but to the sample clock that drives them. > > > > > > Paul, what's your opinion on the Delta 1010's word clock? > > > > no opinion. lets just aim for the specs: what's the jitter? > > Excellent question, and one that seems to be fairly hard to answer, as > none of the 1010 literature I have gives specs for this, and it's not > something easily found by Googling, either. > > That in itself makes me go hmmmm. there is another possibility: that i've been duped by a highly tech- oriented sales pitch and that in reality jitter doesn't matter much.
