>I'd argue that Apogee is *hardly* worth it -- I've never *liked* the sound
>of their convertors. Their filters are very "shimmery" or "smooth" on the
>high-end . . . . . .
>For 96k+, you may get different results, but I still don't like Apogees
>sound -- it washes out way too much high-end detail and does funny things
>to transient response in my professional opinion, because of their
>stylized filters.
That is a really good thing to know in advance, as filtering effects are
precisely what we want to get away from (for the particular sound we are
looking for).
>I built some D/As out of a Crystal 24-bit evaluation board that blew the
>socks off an equivalent Apogee -- with a good clean power supply and
>clock. For about $200 US!
Wow - that's really encouraging!
(BTW, where does one come by something like a Crystal evaluation board?)
>For A/D, I found that a 20-bit Burr-Brown chip
>*sounded* better than the Apogees at 44.1/48k and 24-bit, though most of
>that was still the input filtering.
>
>If it was a personal purchase, I'd be looking at Troisi convertors (not so
>much $$) or db Technologies (if I needed something to *really* spend $$ on
Thanks for the heads-up.
I had not heard of any of these before.
>Keeping the Cult of Saints and Relics **{1} from between your ears and
>your music is often harder than it sounds. "Only a poor craftsman blames
>his tools," and I'd also say many who credit their tools are dilettants!
>I've always tried not to be one of either group! ;)
Agreed!
>the reason their stuff is so good is not directly related to the
>converters themselves, but to the sample clock that drives them.
>apogee has basically the best clocks you can buy.
>
>their gear is not worth the money, but it is better than just about
>anything else. however, my compromise is to buy an apogee clock, when
>possible. so for example, the mackie digital 8 bus that i own has
>mackie's own burr-brown based converter circuitry, but it also has the
>optional apogee clock card to provide word clock to the converters.
This I can understand, and that sounds like a good alternative solution.
Thanks for the feedback.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Please take this discussion in private.
I don't think this merits a response.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks again for the suggestions,
Maluvia
