tim hall wrote:
Yes, but you can't release those pieces under cc licenses unless you have control of copyright. You lose copyright then you lose the right to license those pieces altogether. Being an amateur is a middle-class luxury.
To me, being an amateur is to make art for the sake of art. and being a pro its just a job.
If you're right, for similar reasons, maybe also coding software and releasing it as open source should be a middle-class luxury. Is this the case? I don't think so.
And anyway, how does this thread about copyright and open source relate to being an amateur?
c. -- www.cesaremarilungo.com
