On 2/25/06, Maluvia <terakuma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just went back and reread the thread re: Plextor drivers, as we are looking to buy a DVD-burner, and have been very happy with our Plexwriter, and previous Plextor CD burner. > (Also read the entire thread on cdfreaks.com re:Pxlinux ) > > This is the second time this month I've run into a situation where a hardware manufacturer is refusing both to release their own linux drivers/software, or the information necessary for others to write their own. > > This makes no rational sense to me. > How on earth does it harm them to allow someone else, on their own time and own dime, to write a driver or program for another OS, unless the company is planning to write their own drivers/software and sell them - which in the case of both Plextor and RME does not appear to be the case. > > Allowing 3rd party drivers/software can only increase the market for their products, as they will then be usable on a broader array of operating systems. Bigger market = more $$ for them, doesn't it? > What possible gain is there for them to coerce users into using a M$ OS? > > Unless . . . . . > Not being a programmer, or knowing what is involved in writing drivers I am just wondering: > could it be that MS is refusing to release whatever code is necessary for the hardware manufacturers to write their MS-compatible drivers/software unless they acquiesce to some sort of exclusivity agreement - i. e. agree to neither write Linux (or other OS) drivers/sw, nor release their own hw info that would allow anyone else to do so? > > I just cannot think of any other reason why hardware manufacturers would want to lock their product into a single OS. > > - Maluvia I can understand, at this stage in the game, some companies not supporting Linux officially, but being outright hostile such as Plextor?? That is not acceptable. I'll never buy any [overpriced] Plextor hardware. What is the reason? Is it even legal what they are doing? I don't know the answers, but it hurts my head to even think about it.
