Re: rosegarden without KDE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There's two forces at work here: laziness and opinion. The programmers
doing this in their spare time understandably don't want to reinvent the
wheel, especially not doing something as mundane as GUI can be. More
featureful toolkits allow for more featureful apps with less effort.
Plus some people like KDE and Gnome.

My own tastes steer me to using the gui toolkit only and not the desktop
framework, which necessarily drives any software I write to be more
simple. This is because I as a user prefer fewer dependencies, and I
believe more people will use my stuff if they don't have to install
everything under the sun to use it. I also happen to think that good UIs
are simple and like to delude myself into thinking my choice of only a
toolkit (usually Qt) and my laziness are actually positive factors. :-)
Also I shouldn't hope to deceive anyone into thinking I write much GUI
code of any significance. I'm quite bad at it.

But I completely understand where developers that want to leverage the
more powerful frameworks are coming from.

Incidentally, disk space continues to be a problem even outside of
Africa. I have ample disk space but most of it is tied up in music and
video and my original guess at how big to make my root partition was a
little conservative. Although I did set up LVM, I'm too lazy to do
anything about it and so I am back to watching disk space and cleaning
cruft (and non-cruft) off my system periodically in fits of rage. Mostly
I don't want to have to decide which media must go to make room, and I
always think I'm going to use that media drive space for audio projects
anyhow...

Just my $0.02 in this rantfest.

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 at 23:10 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello *,
> 
> I am working professionel (not as musican) and like to use a program
> like rosegarden, but without KDE and GNOME.  Because I must maintain
> all of my computers my self and make backports and own packages (I am
> working under Debian) I do not want to maintain tonns (86 MByte) of
> EXTRA packages from KDE, which deinstall in the same time my half
> workstation (I hate those monsters of KDE and GNOME and using only
> fvwm which works perfectly since 1999).
> 
> Is it possibel to compile rosegarden without KDE?
> 
> If not, is there another equivalent program?
> 
> Greetings
>     Michelle Konzack
> 
> 
> -- 
> Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
> ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
> Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
>                    50, rue de Soultz         MSM LinuxMichi
> 0033/3/88452356    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
> 

-- 
Hans Fugal ; http://hans.fugal.net
 
There's nothing remarkable about it. All one has to do is hit the 
right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself.
    -- Johann Sebastian Bach

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux