On Fri February 24 2006 12:49, Dana Olson wrote: > great application just the same. But I'll likely use seq24 > myself, as it seems more like my hardware-based > sequencer/synth. So, to the OP, there's an option to look into > if you can deal with loop/pattern-based sequencers. I'll have to look into that myself, as I prefer at least starting in a pattern-based environment for most of my songs. Thanks. Rob
