On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 23:13 -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:42:55PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > > Sorry I beg to differ, ever hear of an "MP3"? > > > > OK, I missed your last paragraph. But I still don't agree with you ;-) > > To be clear, I don't really agree with me either - the consequences > are too radical for me to just swallow. > > But at the same time, I can't really think of a cogent > counterarguement that doesn't involve things like "Well, I didn't > *intend* that number to be a program..." > Why is this a problem - intent is very VERY important in law. Lee