Re: Athlon 64-X2 - slightly different question than the FAQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 00:49 -0800, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
> One person commented that with their 64-X2
> machine, that a larger period size, 256 versus 128, seems better.
> This is generally true for avoiding xruns.
> 
> I'm wondering, is an even larger period size 1K or 2K going
> to make a 64-X2 machine usable. 

What exactly is the problem that you're having?

Lee


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux